Re: [Tlhingan-hol] A long word

[Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net>]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Appleyard
<a.appleyard@btinternet.com> wrote:
> I was looking through the old stuff on my computer and I found this attempt at making a maximum-length Klingon word:-
>
> SuchchuqnISqa'moHlaHlaw'taHneSghachHommeyqoqrajmo'
>
> V:visit VS1:each_other VS2:need VS3:[do_again|resume] VS4:cause VS5:be_able
> VS6:apparently VS7:continuous VS8:honorific VS9:-ation* NS1:diminutive
> NS2:pl_gen NS3:so_called NS4:your_pl_nonsentient NS5:due_to

I have a semi-tangential nitpick. What are you using that analyzes
{-raj} as "your_pl_nonsentient"? The {-ra'} vs. {-raj} distinction is
based on ability to use language, not ability to experience
sensations.

-- ghunchu'wI'

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol