tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 14 17:26:56 2014
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: ghIpDIj
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>{lo’laH} is actually a root verb, not a verb and a suffix. It is distinct from {lo’}. It may LOOK like a verb and a suffix, but it’s not. Though it is indistinguishable from the other root with a suffix, except by grammatical context:</div><div><br></div><div>{lo’} means “use” and can have a direct object. It can’t be used as an adjective.</div><div><br></div><div>{lo’laH} means “be useful” and can be used as an adjective. It can’t take a direct object.</div><div><br></div><div>This distinction quite likely is the result of a goof on Maltz’s part, but it’s one of those delightful little exceptions in the language… unless I’ve horribly misremembered something.</div><br><div>
<div><div>lojmIt tI’wI’ nuv ‘utlh</div><div>Door Repair Guy, Retired Honorably</div></div><div><br></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br><div><div>On Aug 14, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Brad Wilson <<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><font size="2" face="arial">
<div>
<div id="AOLMsgPart_0_0c9e8121-1392-4a65-beec-a60a404b89bf" style="margin: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">TKD has ghIpDIj listed as verb on both sides. These are the only o</font></tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">ther multi-syllable verbs (not including suffixes) I can find:</span></pre><pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">He'So' - stink - TKD, verb on both sides</font></tt></pre><pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">HoSghaj - be powerful - TKD, verb on both sides</font></tt></pre><pre><tt style="font-size: 9pt;"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">nughI' - </font></tt><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 12px;">twist knuckle into someone's head - </span></font><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">1996 qep'a', reiterated in KGT</span></pre><pre style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;"><tt><br>
</tt></pre><pre style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;"><tt><br>
</tt></pre><pre style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;"><tt>Voragh:
This is a rare two-syllable verb.
gheyIl:
Do we know for certain that <ghIpDIj> (court-martial) is a verb, and this is not
an error in TKD?
We know there were other errors. Has it ever been used in canon to support the
verb definition?
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>Voragh:
</tt></pre>AFAIK it's never appeared in canon. I don't have a paperback TKD with me; is
<ghIpDIj> listed as a verb on both sides of the glossary (English-Klingon,
Klingon-English)? Has anyone ever asked Okrand about this?
</tt></pre>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_0c9e8121-1392-4a65-beec-a60a404b89bf -->
</div>
</font>_______________________________________________<br>Tlhingan-hol mailing list<br><a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol<br></blockquote></div><br></body></html>
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol