tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 12 15:34:52 2014
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Translating the past
On 4/12/2014 10:23 AM, ghunchu'wI' wrote:
*wa'Hu' **jIghung.* /Yesterday I was hungry./
*DaHjaj jI'oj.* /Today I am thirsty./
*wa'leS jIDoy'.* /Tomorrow I'll be tired./
This doesn't merely support the "no aspect can be any tense" position.
It /prescribes/ it.
I wasn't hungry at a particular moment yesterday, I was just hungry in
general. If I said {wa'Hu' jIghungpu'} I'd be saying there was a
particular moment yesterday when I was hungry.
These sentences do, by the way, exhibit tense. The tense simply isn't
encoded in a verb suffix. They also exhibit aspect. The aspect is one of
generality.
Yesterday (tense), over the course of the day (aspect), I was hungry.
If I said {wa'Hu' jIghungchoH}, that's another aspect: yesterday there
was a time when I wasn't hungry, then that changed and I was hungry from
that point forward. This might be called ingressive aspect. Yet it's not
from a Type 7 suffix!
Our principal example of canonical Klingon narrative, the paq'batlh,
When did a story not written by Okrand become "our principal example of
canonical Klingon narrative"?
--
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol