tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 15 09:42:56 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] mu' mung
- From: "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] mu' mung
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:42:46 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ytJbactke149W7nFafoeiLEqIzmcnOVQU7xAW/7MOXY=; b=L5jXzEUfCpY39JG/G663w+P1etGsr8HbfcL7tMo7oKd48PggOqq2oQDyPtImpdW0iR /NrfUoti1js86b2vBx2bX+pSfyBkojg/I9L9DosFM2Xgw5D+gu8dViIThMwzHUJseeU2 6fRwA7+//YUcYN5suCUjJsMUipoJ+f7L5lk5/Uz+h8mr/jajCPu4Y+XsbNnZ45yXlVCE 0PVREpCp48UpC6lsoUoyW8VN7GglZ+XtS8CDJnCNwWG4fBlZfsJTSQfMKuHJLmNj3Tf2 L69pxSkZ5VSBUVXKdH15vylUshlBT2byZS8Oy+le6qaDgy2ZHcBbD52zX+UBPKQdVsTk SS3g==
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
- List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
- References: <CA+7zAmMa-25cfx5gSBnN_EKwR3ZWz-rC8yf4oMjhsxVJw=95nQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
De'vID:
>> {ghojmoHwI'} n. teacher, mentor [obvious extension of {ghojmoH} from
>> TKD, but does this appear as its own word in canon?]
loghaD:
> Used in "Diplomatic Implausability"; approved by Okrand.
De'vID:
>> {ma' to'vor} n. Mauk-to'Vor ritual
loghaD:
> Same as above.
Is everything in "Diplomatic Implausibility" vetted by MO? What about
other DeCandido works with glossaries, are those words approved too?
For example, here is the glossary to "A Good Day to Die":
http://books.google.com/books?id=nRuva4zrxFIC&lpg=PA284&dq=Habnagh&hl=sv&pg=PA281#v=onepage&q&f=false
Here's the one to "Diplomatic Implausibility":
http://books.google.com/books?id=tikiYLYOadcC&lpg=PP1&dq=Diplomatic%20Implausibility&hl=sv&pg=PA244#v=onepage&q&f=false
"A Burning House":
http://books.google.com/books?id=YlMTihkejQUC&lpg=PT410&hl=sv&pg=PT403#v=onepage&q&f=false
"Enemy Territory" also apparently has a glossary, but I couldn't find
it online. I did find this reference to it:
http://klingon.livejournal.com/56112.html
There are a bunch of {tlhIngan Hol} words in the above that I've never
seen elsewhere, such as {'aDanjI'}, {chuSwI'}, {Da'ar}, {Habnagh},
{HurqIq}, {ghInaq}, {ghonglIq}, {jInjoq}, {qaDrav}, {qorvIt},{ramjep}
(a type of bird), {So'HIp}, {tlhInja}, {tlhongaD}. There's also
*{Hestlh'ng} which doesn't even fit the orthography.
Also, what I have noted as {ma'veq} is there written as *{mevaq}, but
it's apparently intended to be the same word. Ditto for *{ma'Do'vor}
instead of {ma'to'vor}, *{parmaHay} for {parmaqqay}.
What's the canonicity of these words?
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol