tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 13 20:30:25 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh wa'maH Hut: <ghelbe' HoD>
At 08:45 13/01/2012, you wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Qov <[email protected]> wrote:
> merchuqba' loD Hota'ro' je.
be'vam qawlaw' Hoch'e'.
tlhIngan DujDaq loDpu' law' law' be'pu' law' puS. be'pu' lulIjbe'.
> qaStaHvIS vagh lup tamtaH Hota'ro'. tagha' jatlh "vIQaylu'. nuqDaq ghaH
> latlh'e'?" 'IQlaw' Hota'ro'.
'ej 'Iv ghaH latlh'e'?
lIHbe'lu'pu'.
> loDvaD jatlh vajar, "Daqotlhpu''a'?"
> tlhuHlaHmeH loS loD ghIq jatlh, "ghobe'. Hegh vIqotlh. yIQorgh, qaH."
Qorgh'eghlaHba' Hota'ro'.
'ach HoHbe'pu'.
> yeptaHvIS QamchoH loD 'ej QIt mej.
law' lutmey. 'Iq.
jItlhIj. tugh rarchuqchoH lutmey. lut'a'vam vIqonqa'chugh qeSlIj vIqelbej.
> ...labbe'pu' HoD 'utlh.
This makes me think that ghutar's uncle has done something called "not
transmit". I'm not sure how much better {labpu'be'} is, but I believe
that it is better enough.
You frequently have this issue with negation and aspects. It doesn't
do anything to me at all. I will have to sit down with canon sometime
and see if I can come to an understanding.
> lutDaj vI'olmeH novvam De' peghbe'bogh HIlab. 'ej
> tlhIngan Hol laHDaj yIchov.
puS De'vam 'e' vIpIH, 'ach jImujrup.
puSbej.
> 'ej qaghelnIS: nuq bop bom 'e' DaHar?
bopbogh Soj 'anglu', loQ 'e' vIHaj.
bom DalIjbe'chugh jIQuch.
> paw ghutar. tlhej vay'. batlh ghaHvaD jatlh ghutar, 'elpa'.
reH ghutar laHHey vIbuSchoH. mIwDaj vItu'laHchugh, ghojwI'pu'
vIpIlmoHmeH chaq ghaH vIDalaH.
Hoch vuv. quv buS. nuvpu' potlh tu' 'ej potlhmoH.
- Qov
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
![[KLI Member]](/pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}
![[Hol po'wI']](/pics/level3_big.png "[Hol po'wI']"){kind=small}