tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 02 00:34:11 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Monopoly - New Canon

De'vID jonpIn ([email protected])

From: "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Monopoly - New Canon
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 09:34:01 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4u9LqxEHYDbZ9kxdEDiQDkfVJjlREAUbY9PD8aLsQMI=; b=di/1p5oR6e8Bucbbk6UGs8upwCSPpdUjzBBD3nk+0RrzVBTfmvXwyP+LibdUY9jMbB P+7SmKGd+jVfhqz47wLjwn/a738RbTZe3Fn1JalG6Ast+nRFdy5O3GeQn7TkJYhmMhSh ZIKDF46BmL1N7tTBdO/O2NCsamVZH0aJIuo+M=
List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>

<p>De&#39;vID:<br>
&gt; &gt; {ngIq} adv. each (we also saw this from {paq&#39;batlh})</p>
<p>QeS &#39;utlh:<br>
&gt; I think this is not an adverb, but a noun, like {Hoch} and {&#39;op}.</p>
<p>Hagh qoHpu&#39; neH HeghtaHvIS SuvwI&#39;pu&#39;.</p>
<p>bIlughbej.  {Hoch} {&#39;op} je rur.  DIp &#39;oH.</p>
<p>I somehow got it stuck in my head that it was similar to {ghIq}, but you&#39;re right, reading the canon sentences as if {ngIq} behaved like {Hoch} makes more sense.</p>
<p>--<br>
De&#39;vID</p>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

Prev by Date: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh wa'maH loS: <ngoy' HoD>
Next by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qoSwIj
Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Monopoly - New Canon
Next by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Monopoly - New Canon
Index(es):