tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 06 15:34:46 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Tlhingan-hol] Eurotalk - New Specialism - Time
- From: "Adm qe'San" <[email protected]>
- Subject: [Tlhingan-hol] Eurotalk - New Specialism - Time
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 23:34:29 -0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1320622470; bh=kGbkxVHdz1ucxohtttsmSGla5WpBZDJ5reGxnrAzruQ=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Reply-To:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=lAcfMgLVW7UN+B/eDzDg2Gy2DDPZZXcYM19kO6SgcVjfS+tYOTGny/XLXme6rHxHPfNgnA3nB+W0qsyPRSEOKKmVWH4Gr647/XsdZXQtu8U2gvl5bK+PNFgoKCkrFoBEBmRBJQB/7XUtSrMfcJ4n5ObamWMTuZeYbNvBj2MHg7k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Reply-To:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=ogLENQhHqtD9FA28ikZaOzIxxq5NntmsDsbJMDodgT2Ss8j5ooGustxwX8rVNZYnFEYTFKFb0N/DDpiDEI8wAzTRn/eBVzJsq2HRfYt1zLlvXOgLfcJ+WXDlcqnUzp7uoiDvv/+hhoXbINOphWhGgjKpjE1Yb/QlEb4ZqtWBCQs= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
- List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
- References: <CAMZYS2UFtXqNEfmnNbExzR7q--Nb0pOZCsx0zDpShR9JbX6RCQ@mail.gmail.com>, , <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Thread-index: AcybaMPAG/tze/VFTDaREa0v49YznABcNzBA
Time - repmey
one o'clock a.m. (01:00) - wa'vatlh rep
one o'clock p.m. (13:00) - wa'maH wejvatlh rep
two o'clock a.m. (02:00) - cha'vatlh rep
two o'clock p.m. (14:00) - wa'maH loSvatlh rep
three o'clock a.m. (03:00) - wejvatlh rep
three o'clock p.m. (15:00) - wa'maH vaghvatlh rep
four o'clock a.m. (04:00) - loSvatlh rep
four o'clock p.m. (16:00) - wa'maH javvatlh rep
five o'clock a.m. (05:00) - vaghvatlh rep
five o'clock p.m. (17:00) - wa'maH Sochvatlh rep
six o'clock a.m. (06:00) - javvatlh rep
six o'clock p.m. (18:00) - wa'maH chorghvatlh rep
seven o'clock a.m. (07:00) - Sochvatlh rep
seven o'clock p.m. (19:00) - wa'maH Hutvatlh rep
eight o'clock a.m. (08:00) - chorghvatlh rep
eight o'clock p.m. (20:00) - cha'maH vatlh rep
nine o'clock a.m. (09:00) - Hutvatlh rep
nine o'clock p.m. (21:00) - cha'maH wa'vatlh rep
ten o'clock a.m. (10:00) - wa'maH vatlh rep
ten o'clock p.m. (22:00) - cha'maH cha'vatlh rep
eleven o'clock a.m. (11:00) - wa'maH wa'vatlh rep
eleven o'clock p.m. (23:00) - cha'maH wejvatlh rep
twelve o'clock a.m. (12:00) - wa'maH cha'vatlh rep
twelve o'clock p.m. (00:00) - pagh rep
Five past five (5:05)a.m. - vaghvatlh vagh rep
5:05 p.m. (17:05) - wa'maH Sochvatlh vagh rep
Ten past three (3:10)a.m. - wejvatlh wa'maH rep
3:10 p.m. (15:05) - wa'maH vaghvatlh wa'maH rep
Quarter past six (6:15)a.m. - javvatlh wa'maH vagh rep
6:15 p.m. (18:15) - wa'maH chorghvatlh wa'maH vagh rep
Twenty past two (2:20)a.m. - cha'vatlh cha'maH rep
2:20 p.m. (14:20) - wa'maH loSvatlh cha'maH rep
Twenty-five past seven (7:25)a.m. - Sochvatlh cha'maH vagh rep
7:25 p.m. (19:25) - wa'maH Hutvatlh cha'maH vagh rep
Half-past eight (8:30)a.m. - chorghvatlh wejmaH rep
8:30 p.m. (20:30) - cha'maH vatlh wejmaH rep
Twenty to two (1:40)a.m. - wa'vatlh loSmaH rep
1:40 p.m. (13:40) - wa'maH wejvetlh loSmaH rep
Quarter to ten (9:45)a.m. - Hutvatlh loSmaH vagh rep
9:45 p.m. (21:45) - cha'maH wa'vatlh loSmaH vagh rep
Ten to eleven (10:50)a.m. - wa'maH vatlh vaghmaH rep
10:50 p.m. (22:50) - cha'maH cha'vatlh vaghmaH rep
Five to twelve (11:55)a.m. - wa'maH wa'vatlh vaghmaH vagh rep
11:55 p.m. (23:55) - cha'maH wejvatlh vaghmaH vagh rep
Five past eight (8:05)a.m. - chorghvatlh vagh rep
8:05 p.m. (20:05) - cha'maH vatlh vagh rep
Ten past nine (9:10)a.m. - Hutvatlh wa'maH rep
9:10 p.m. (21:10) - cha'maH wa'vatlh wa'maH rep
Quarter past four (4:15)a.m. - loSvatlh wa'maH vagh rep
4:15 p.m. (16:15) - wa'maH javvatlh wa'maH vagh rep
Twenty past ten (10:20) a.m. - wa'maH vatlh cha'maH rep
10:20 p.m. (22:20) - cha'maH cha'vatlh cha'maH rep
Twenty-five past twelve (12:25)p.m. - wa'maH cha'vatlh cha'maH vagh rep
12:25 a.m. (00:25) - pagh cha'maH vagh rep
Half part five (5:30)a.m. - vaghvatlh wejmaH rep
5:30 p.m. (17:30) - wa'maH Sochvatlh wejmaH rep
Twenty to twelve (11:40)a.m. - wa'maH wa'vatlh loSmaH rep
11:30 p.m. (23:40) - cha'maH wejvatlh loSmaH rep
Quarter to eight (7:45)a.m. - Sochvatlh loSmaH vagh rep
7:45 p.m. (19:45) - wa'maH Hutvatlh loSmaH vagh rep
Ten to one (12:50)p.m. - wa'maH cha'vatlh vaghmaH rep
12:50 a.m. (00:50) - pagh vaghmaH rep
Five to seven (6:55)a.m. - javvatlh vaghmaH vagh rep
6:55 p.m. (18:55) - wa'maH chorghvatlh vaghmaH vagh rep
Quarter past one (1:15)a.m. - wa'vatlh wa'maH vagh rep
1:15 p.m. (13:15) - wa'maH wejvatlh wa'maH vagh rep
Half past two (2:30)a.m. - cha'vatlh wejmaH rep
2:30 p.m. (14:30) - wa'maH loSvatlh wejmaH rep
Quarter to four (3:45) a.m. - wejvatlh loSmaH vagh rep
3:45 p.m. (15:45) - wa'maH vaghvatlh loSmaH vagh rep
Twenty past four (4:20) a.m. - loSvatlh cha'maH rep
4:20 p.m. (16:20) - wa'maH javvatlh cha'maH rep
~~Quote~~
Marc Okrand
Jon --
I thought about that when I was doing the time phrases. My thinking at the
time was something like this: 9 hundred is Hutvatlh, as you say. Normal way
to say "900." 10 hundred -- other than when talking about time -- probably
wouldn't be said in Klingon. Instead, you'd say "one thousand" (wa'SaD,
wa'SanID). So "10 hundred" is a specialized form for time only. The idea of
telling time by using "hundreds" was borrowed by Klingons from some other
culture, so it's already weird and therefore doesn't have to follow normal
Klingon rules. I separated the vatlh from the wa'maH to show that it is a
specialized usage of vatlh (wa'maHvatlh can't be a normal Klingon number). I
left it attached to Hutvatlh and so on because they happen to be regular
Klingon numbers anyway.
For better or worse, that's was I was thinking. I think it's OK to have the
vatlh as a separate word (though I'm sure it will spark a lot of discussion
and probably some disagreement).
All the best,
- Marc
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol