tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 13 10:07:30 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hegh'a' Holmaj?
- From: "lojmIt tI'wI' nuv" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Hegh'a' Holmaj?
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 13:05:36 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=l1XsjQmarXJoZ6XNHZlTAaW3PXmi4/K/DMGKhCSpvAI=; b=GcCmtHou9HwYMe8ZrR7J9yeE/kR8ZJkj1NsSwzjG5Nr8k0GEeAyiPh/EhOba1Dfaxy AfZLihpadV7r5G9d/E/fxxgU4HPSLf+tkNgwz4UDQDmJuDBli7mS8Y5hQX6mrWp6gKGn wXWNSi/WJv+P5EcXkBIKGrTTfpw5mRMiqe6Sg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=Zyl3dCsPJHTTxbvND1Yyx71tCbAKG9qEw1Akq8A0M5Z3887wwsxw4WzvAdntgK/EVm IHCVxvLZgRKCBhhJYm8Kztv6l+beSyuiiSFRmYKnwD5vxVhNyW4XrbwUiyduP3XSaySW pBsOIAnhRuun1XSjkIMi0dTazDj1I5lbQ1z0w=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
<<wej 'e' tlhojbe' neH>>?
nuqjatlh?
Is this the cue to rehash the double-negative discussion?
pItlh.
lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
On May 13, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Terrence Donnelly wrote:
> Heghpu' Holmaj; Hegh wej 'e' tlhojbe' neH.
>
> -- ter'eS
>
> --- On Fri, 5/13/11, lojmIt tI'wI' nuv <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: lojmIt tI'wI' nuv <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Hegh'a' Holmaj?
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Friday, May 13, 2011, 9:21 AM
>> DaHjaj po jIvemmeH mughuHmoH
>> tlhaqwIj. jIHu'. jItuQ'eghmoH. nIQ vISop. yaHwIj vIghoSmeH
>> jIyIt. chal vIqel. tugh SISchugh vISIv. (I know. Some will
>> object to that construction and doubtless tell me how I
>> should have said it. Consider it a favor I'm doing you to
>> give you something to respond to and jar you out of an
>> otherwise boring day.)
>>
>> yaHDaq jIvum. jIyev. Hegh'a' Holmaj?
>>
>> pItlh.
>> lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>