tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 09 13:27:53 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: DaH
- From: "lojmIt tI'wI' nuv" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: DaH
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:25:24 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=oE2sMED/P7jlBgNx1FzEn5YzRPL1rSVZde3hRiEWgYk=; b=wPBCHEEJe1G3tX8/jeY9Ej2yL+d7T44kbE8SftQTQV2u1gqLlPCmWHrWckMLYsbuKk rJntqE4nvDrR8mCZBbF5cg+gL2lAu13BnkjwG13uWu7sYYz2GFzUj4flaPWkWY+kcFtL v7Y10XxH0hrMNl9sYWFKjkHDL48kHOY2MFK9c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=qGr+mpjXBlsM3AQZRUlHv1wdk4o3ATr62blNVxQxdsFJUEbEb01/JsyaOJn79Jkvta eW+68gz1F5P56b7kLxa0/D9WlrYjuYGEeZ7Qh/wYYPSzGQ0RqD+mxqyLdqtSTS9vkBor tZmLF0WcOxjrWhX4vhEiRQO8miRs9cdVEU10E=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
maja'chuqmeH:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Robyn Stewart wrote:
> At 09:55 09/02/2011, you wrote:
>> megh vISoplI'. meghwIj vIvutta'. roD jIHvaD meghwIj vut be'nalwI',
>> 'ach DachlI'.
>
> vIlaDtaHvIS nIQ vISop. *DachlI'* is a strange construction. What do
> you feel it is achieving that *Dach* doesn't
DachlI' be'nalwI'. loSleS chegh. tlheDta' 'ej tugh chegh. cheghmeH poH nabta'. vaj DachlI'. qatlh Huj 'e' DaHar?
>> wej Qu' toy' be'nalwI':
>
> ghorgh tagh? (jIqID). Does one toy' a Qu'? I would use ruch or ta' or nID
I never considered that {ruch} could take a direct object. The def in Ultralingua is: "1. proceed. 2. go ahead. 3. do it." Without the numbers, that's what it says in the Addendum of TKD. I read that more as, "Get off your butt and be active at what you and I both already know you should be doing."
I'd expect {ta'} and {nID} to be something you'd use to describe {Qumey} in the past or future. You don't accomplish a mission until it's done. To attempt/try a mission doesn't sound very committed. I prefer to serve my missions. I'm certainly not the first to use that verb on that direct object.
> Qu' wa'DIch: DaHjaj *loDnI'pu' muSHa'bogh veng* (*vIla'DelvIya'*)Daq
>> ghomlI' paqmey polmeH qach'a' vumwI'pu'. jeS be'nalwI'.
>
> paqmey polmeH qach'a'Daq So''egh chotwI' ta'lI' bachpa'. vay' bach
> 'e' nab'a' be'nallI'?
Daqmey law' lo' chotwI'pu'. qatlh le' paqmey polmeH qach'a'? paqmey polmeH qach'a'mey lo' chotQo'bogh nuvmey law'. qatlh be'nalwI' DapIH? yIyep. batlhDaj DatIchchugh, jupwI' SoHbe'ba'.
>> Qu' cha'DIch: pa' Dab be'nalwI' be'nI'. be'nI'vam parHa' be'nalwI'.
>> pa' Dab be'nalwI' SoS, vav je. SoS par. vav muS. Hoch SuchnIS.
>
> ghu'vetlhmo' Qe'Daq be'nI' Such 'e' vIchup.
>
> vIlaDchu'pu'pa' jImejnIS.
qaStaHvIS Soch jaj be'nalwI' be'nI' juH Dab be'nalwI'. Suchpa', wa' 'uQ vut be'nalwI' be'nI' loDnal 'ej be'nalwI' vav juH lughoS. 'uQvam luqeng.
pItlh.
lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
>> Qu' wejDIch: may'ron chu' be'nalwI'. cha' may'ron ghaj, 'ach QapHa'
>> wa'. tI'nISlu'. vengvamDaq tI'wI' pup tu'lu'. "Liberty Bellows"
>> ponglu'. pongvam SuqDI' qIDlu'ba'.
>>
>> vaj wejHu' tlheDmeH He baS lo'bogh lupwI''a''e' lIgh be'nalwI'.
>> wa'Hu' may'ron tI'wI' SuchDI' be'nalwI', may'ronDaj tI'be'lu' 'e'
>> wuq be'nalwI'. ngev 'ej may'ron chu' je'. may'ron ngevbogh tIn law'
>> may'ron je'bogh tIn puS. mach be'nalwI' 'ej may'ron tIn lo'DI' 'oy'
>> volchaH. may'ron ngevbogh 'ugh law' may'ron je'bogh 'ugh puS.
>>
>> *Honer* ngev. *Italian* may'ron je'. Quchqu'. 'ey may'ronvam ghogh.
>>
>> qaStaHvIS wa' Hogh SojwIj vISuqnIS. be'nalwI'mo' Qu'vamvaD jIbuDpu'
>> 'ach DaH jIDub. jIbepbe'. jIvutlaHbej.
>>
>> cha'Hu' rep 'Iq vInatlh. bo'Deghmey QeH vIreH. wa'Hu' vIreHQo'.
>> Qu'wIj vItoy' neH.
>>
>> pItlh.
>> lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
>
>
>
>