tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 28 09:44:29 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] maH?

Philip Newton ([email protected])

• From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] maH?
• Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:43:57 +0100
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=I0AK46CzOlqnMdODAeqMcOG2gs9ZNv8DUkoDw9GR1e4=; b=OvR5n0ne/b7u2Oetj1UIxv2fB4RmoKULMjPdAz7BDtiT16Gqo/7Y5fkEUNe/xuvgRe JERios+q1RAxBaRJ0xiQIaHy/xac7M++JP4FLFGgs6ARLc2HONi4p+u7RPLVtGigy4b9 H3LBa4YDuQQq92amSamAKEfmnkBgJQ5ThUq3U=
• In-reply-to: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6031FB0D2FE23@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
• List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
• List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
• List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6031FB0D2FE23@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 18:38, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
> He has used these "number forming elements" separately before:

There's also the "military time" style time designations on the
TalkNow! CD, where we have, for example, "Hutvatlh rep" (09:00, oh
nine hundred hours) but "wa'maH vatlh rep" (10:00, ten hundred hours)
- in the second case (where it directly follows {-maH}), the {vatlh}
is written separately. (The next hour would be "wa'maH wa'vatlh rep",
11:00, eleven hundred hours.)

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

• References:
  • [Tlhingan-hol] maH?
    • From: Josh Badgley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Tlhingan-hol] maH?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] maH?
• Next by Date: [Tlhingan-hol] wu'qIy Hol
• Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] maH?
• Next by thread: [Tlhingan-hol] wu'qIy Hol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level