tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 04 12:28:37 2010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: pIqaD handwriting
- From: David Kummer <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: pIqaD handwriting
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 14:26:29 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9zbtNU/mJnwD13hB15ebTDbwaTO+yCqCvT+ACtJ+lyY=; b=OeBNWu/PW/kAvOuKB10+IIEi/0EhIxuwpGwE1Z57MwMkF4ccQRTN9ff8iDYsPeeff1 1IvDz8hGDmvwLqJG+sryaLe70hLT6TG2ieHzTj6ZcNZc9ol2ErRQREP1oBo8kFD/6zyW wfOaaeOHF8FHr1k77DsaufMWFKITW843v3QMA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OkFqdGs32IYge2IgNmL5DmgEQcHuSY2wkBsx5pCwr9xQ4mvyJl7WN3ENwb+hew+XFK KS09r943zz56EHYggvZpSq1Vb8xBAHgYt1xTg7nR/3RkNQuRDfUn3CWWBQevL7+bm8FD PaGlYOoW50m2AKCrwNqtJRwM37dSZmpNgTAnY=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
> I recently received a postcard where the sender wrote their message in
> pIqaD.
>
> My excitement soon faded when I realized that handwritten pIqaD is
> remarkably different than when typed with a computer.
>
> It was also different than the way I write the characters myself.
>
> Eventually, I found out that they used
> http://klingonska.org/pic/longhand.jpg
>
>
> So, is there a style that's more (or less) preferred than others?
>
> Anyone else had problems reading pIqaD written by someone else?
>
Sounds about par for the course when it comes to cursive and handwriting,
particularly compared to typing. :P
Is there any documentation on Klingon "calligraphy"? What kind of writing
utensils did they use?