tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Sep 14 12:56:14 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: nom*i*nal*ize 2. to convert (an underlying clause) into a noun phrase

MorphemeAddict (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



In a message dated 9/14/2009 12:43:25 Eastern Daylight Time, 
terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net writes:

> What's interesting about these is that these are different types of 
> suffixes. From MO's description, it sounded like you couldn't use a naked verb 
> plus {-ghach} because some sort of time or state was implied by {-ghach} 
> that the naked verb didn't convey, so one had to use one of the "aspectual" 
> suffixes, such as {-taH} or {-qa'}. But the only aspectual suffix in the 
> above group is {-qa'}, and the others are more like modal suffixes.  So maybe 
> the need for an intervening suffix is more of a formal requirement than 
> something inherent in the meaning of {-ghach}.
> 
> -- ter'eS
> 

That's been my understanding all along.

lay'tel SIvten






Back to archive top level