tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 26 16:57:10 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: The topic marker -'e'

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: The topic marker -'e'
• Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:56:07 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Christopher Doty wrote:
> But I disagree. A noun with -vaD followed by a another noun is never
> a single noun phrase, and I don't think any of the cases where I used
> it could it be construed as such. Because in a n-n phrase, the first
> noun can't have any suffixes....

Good! So let's hear another sentence using {-vaD} and see where we're 
at. And remember, "N1 for the N2" is an illegal noun-noun phrase.

-- 
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The topic marker -'e'
    • From: "Christopher Doty" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: The topic marker -'e'
    • From: "Christopher Doty" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: The topic marker -'e'
• Next by Date: Re: The topic marker -'e'
• Previous by thread: Re: The topic marker -'e'
• Next by thread: Re: The topic marker -'e'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level