tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 20 04:46:49 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Question problem
- From: Doq <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Question problem
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 07:44:57 -0400
- Authentication-results: smtp04.embarq.synacor.com [email protected]; auth=pass (LOGIN)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=embarqmail.com; s=s012408; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; [email protected]; t=1242819899; h=From:Subject:Date:To:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=H54/gMzmK1J/edqfInXlrlFpAjk=; b=VnkEWyeLNOCDB61a/ZfVgLeO8ulj6G2RkN8BDIKfh3z96vQ8Redgq9ePQ01f61Oq DHOrlYXsUcZUTaGy4Aa6bS6ukF8KOK+9z0dw78oEfWXh9kUhyz5aOc6dXbNJWkWY;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- X_cmae_category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
We were told that question words take the place of the words that
answer them. {nuq} is treated grammatically like the noun it replaces.
The answer could be the same sentence with {nuq} replaced by the noun
that answers the question. I had thought that discussions similarly
took the "beginning" question words as adverbials.
My mistake, I guess.
Of course, that doesn't resolve why we should prefer to have the
adverbial or the question word first, except to mimic the English word
order preference.
Doq
On May 18, 2009, at 9:50 PM, David Trimboli wrote:
> Doq wrote:
>> I wanted to ask, "Why are you starting slowly?"
>>
>> Suddenly, I realized that I had one grammatical slot to put two words
>> in. I don't think we've been given any license to use two adverbials
>> with a single verb, since adverbials don't have conjunctions like
>> nouns and verbs do. Meanwhile, the question word for "why" is
>> grammatically treated as an adverbial, so I'm stuck.
>
> Is it? TKD 6.4 simply says the question words /nuqDaq/, /ghorgh/,
> /qatlh/, and /chay'/ occur "at the beginning of the sentence." It says
> nothing about them taking an "adverbial slot."
>
> In fact, we don't know anything about "adverbial slots." TKD 5.4
> simply
> says that most adverbials occur "at the beginning of a sentence."
> We've
> never SEEN two adverbials in a single sentence (not counting /neH/,
> which works differently), but that doesn't automatically deny us the
> possibility.
>
> Basic Klingon sentence structure seems to be very amorphous. I picture
> it this way:
>
> <header> <object> <verb> <subject>
>
> where <header> is a nebulous blob containing all the bits that aren't
> the object, the verb, or the subject. Timestamps tend to come first,
> adverbials tend to come before nouns, question words tend to come
> before
> everything else. Of those tendencies, I think only the one about
> timestamps is explicit (TKD p. 179); the others probably come about
> due
> to our native language instincts. Strictly speaking, according to the
> book, timestamps tend to come first, adverbials tend to come last, and
> everything else appears between the two.
>
> This general structure has, of course, many exceptions. This is not an
> all-inclusive formula.
>
> qatlh QIt bItaghlI'?
>
> (Notice the lowercase /q/ in /qatlh/!)
>
> --
> David Trimboli
> http://www.trimboli.name/
>
>
>