tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 05 16:31:36 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: betleH

[email protected] ([email protected])

• From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: betleH
• Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:29:58 -0800 (PST)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=asqx/da+wf1uQbPu5dAg8Fe4olIU9OX/r/0yCpFPJnxS8Fa7J+Ap+fic5C1G5NrPLWxyA9/1Z1ox77mrUC6Y/TE8e42xfujQjkLudhCw0Wi/NQn+1OdIe5SZaUfagaxZmDN4jjxgVqddIhWJZEzSZqyFN5J0BATFKl2btMMMyos=;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

betleHna' rurbe'.
 
SuSvaj
--- On Wed, 2/4/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: betleH
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 8:33 PM

batlh 'etlh quvHa'moH vay'!  
Suy HejtaHvIS betleH lo' nIHwI'. 
lay'tel SIvten






      

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: betleH
    • From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • betleH
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: RE: betleH
• Next by Date: Re: betleH
• Previous by thread: RE: betleH
• Next by thread: Re: betleH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level