tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 02 15:35:06 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Numbers with pronouns
- From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Numbers with pronouns
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:27:17 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MTmnBue+zZxQt2a84nKH1LE+trK3zsafZNhrMfAWqI4=; b=WYq7sxbhNJWV3SUa6vgzfkzZ8tCz3axC8R+q8Y4iVj/jIbExEULtYm/Sx/T7mhlEwZ PBYrpp1+YtQbSHMV5U8etr3j9ttdMVkGiWEUmSB3IkVbc+luAgqNdXveK+y9G3KE8BL8 BvF6a7p4D+R11ww4ZcWRFOy4tUn8f+FOkG1Bs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vxOMf4becId7YqnA/MRkJTZv/OOHe1zJccvRBzPubZWMaVOfqnVy4Eq2vyGSZ2LUsB NMb1rfjkC+yoyaFsb+aBB9hk9d0RnXYyOs7viSyXgalSRV8lPU2IO8ixQPM7H2M8mD/l nk/VaZCgT1gglvf2v4kz63Xaojdeg20BpptLk=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
I think the list might have hiccuped. This was about the point at
which I got an email response from Voragh to this, with his response
timestamped as EARLIER than your original message... Unless Voragh
can time travel. (And if you can, why are you holding out on us!
Let's go to the future!!!)
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 15:23, Seruq <[email protected]> wrote:
> Weird. When I sent that message, it included two quoted lines that I was replying to. When I
> received it back, the quoted lines were stripped off.
>
>
>>
>> jIQub vaj jIH.
>>
>> It's not canon. I suppose it could be labelled as poetic
>> license. But how would you do that sentence?
>>
>>
>> DloraH
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>