tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 03 11:01:08 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: purple

naHQun ([email protected])



On 1/3/08, Doq <[email protected]> wrote:
> Many human languages lack a word for purple. That doesn't mean the
> speakers of those languages can't see the color. It just means that
> Maltz neglected to include it in his definitions of {SuD} and {Doq}.
> He also didn't include chartreuse, mauve, brown, grey and a lot of
> other colors.

brown~Doq 'ej wovbe' MSN?

> There is no reason to fixate on purple and jump to
> conclusions about Klingon physiology.

"The fact that neither SuD nor Doq includes what is called "violet" or
"purple" in Federation Standard may be related to KLINGON
PHYSIOLOGY--that is, exactly how the Klingon eye processes different
wavelengths of light." KGT pp82-83 emphasis added

>
> Okrand was playing with a linguistic generalization when he created
> his color words. Some human languages have only two words for color
snip

linguistic joke; got it-
more bluer-purple-SuD
more reder-purple-Doq

I understand-discussion over.

~naHQun


-- 
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=508314975
http://www.myspace.com/naHQun
http://www.angelfire.com/tx4/purpleelaphants/
http://www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=17154199825822026505
http://www.twitter.com/roneyii

Modern playwrights have become obsessed with writing human
interpretations of alien theatrical works while ignoring completely
our own unique cultural heritage.~Bashir; "The Die is Cast" (DS9)





Back to archive top level