tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 01 04:07:35 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: idea for writing system

Lawrence John Rogers ([email protected])

• From: "Lawrence John Rogers" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: idea for writing system
• Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:04:38 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

qa-ghItlh QaH 

choâoyâ 

qalajbeâ 

ghopji bIlegh 

Hab SoSlI Quch 

 

ghunchu'wI' writes: 

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> 
 

ghunchu'wI' writes: 

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
>  
> 

ghunchu'wI' writes: 

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> 
 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: idea for writing system
    • From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Best heinrich proposition
• Next by Date: For: webarch. Britney and Paris Lesbian video
• Previous by thread: Best heinrich proposition
• Next by thread: Re: idea for writing system
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level