tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 27 15:01:38 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: TUNGUSKA mupmeH Daq tu'lu''a'?

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: TUNGUSKA mupmeH Daq tu'lu''a'?
• Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:34:59 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Voragh:
> >TUNGUSKA mupmeH Daq tu'lu''a'?
> >Tunguska impact crater found?
> >
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6239334.stm
> >
> >Suggestions for "crater"?

Robyn Stewart:
>chunDab Saqpu'ghach

Saqjan ghaj'a' chunDab?  <mon>

>chunDab ghor Daq

"meteor('s) surface site"

I wonder... can {ghor} "surface (of planet)" also refer to the surface of 
the meteor itself, or only to planets - and nothing else?

I suppose I could go with a relative clause:

   Daq'e' muppu'bogh chunDab
   the site that the meteor struck/impacted

   Daq muppu'bogh chunDab'e'
   the meteor that struck/impacted the site

Of these, I still prefer my first attempt:  {mupmeH Daq} "impact site".  Or 
should this be {muplu'meH Daq}?  (Using {-meH} and {-lu'} always confuses me!)




--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons

• References:
  • TUNGUSKA mupmeH Daq tu'lu''a'?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: TUNGUSKA mupmeH Daq tu'lu''a'?
    • From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Avoid enhancement pills
• Next by Date: BG: jIjatlhqa'
• Previous by thread: Re: TUNGUSKA mupmeH Daq tu'lu''a'?
• Next by thread: Re: TUNGUSKA mupmeH Daq tu'lu''a'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level