tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 23 12:11:28 2007
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:10:27 EDT
In a message dated 7/23/2007 10:42:16 AM Central Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
> You're certainly right WRT English usage, but how can you tell Klingon
> usage is the same based on our ONE example of {naQ} I cited above? (I
> though we had more examples too, but we don't AFAIK.)
I couldn't find any other example of {naQ} as a verb either. There are lots
of examples of {naQ} as a noun. Maybe you were somehow thinking of those.
lay'tel SIvten </HTML>