tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 12 09:36:13 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: {teH} and {-na'} (was Re: Changing The Language By Inference)

...Paul ([email protected])

• From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: {teH} and {-na'} (was Re: Changing The Language By Inference)
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:34:41 -0800 (PST)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Alan Anderson wrote:
> ja' ...Paul:
>
>> ghIQbe' SuvwI' teH!  ;)
>
> You probably shouldn't use {teH} this way.  That's what {-na'} is for:
>
> ghIQbe' SuvwI'na'.

loQ pIm qechmeyvam, /IMHO/ -- 'ach <<SuvwI' quv>> vIjatlhnISpu' 'e' 
vIchID...

Suvbejbogh ghot ngu' <<SuvwI'na'>> neH; <<SuvwI' teH>> vIjatlhDI', batlh 
Suvbogh ghot vIngu' 'e' vIHechpu'...

vIQIjchu'ta''a'?

...Paul

          ** ...Paul, [email protected], Insane Engineer **
   ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
    "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;
         the point is to discover them." -- Galileo Galilei

• References:
  • Re: Purpose Clauses (was Re: "conjunction"?)
    • From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
  • Changing The Language By Inference (was Re: Purpose Clauses)
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
  • {teH} and {-na'} (was Re: Changing The Language By Inference)
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Changing The Language By Inference (was Re: Purpose Clauses)
• Next by Date: Re: mu'tlhegh ngajqu'
• Previous by thread: {teH} and {-na'} (was Re: Changing The Language By Inference)
• Next by thread: Re: Changing The Language By Inference (was Re: Purpose Clauses)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level