tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 26 08:29:36 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>

Alan Anderson (aranders@insightbb.com) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



ja' qa'vaj:

> I always saw {naDev} as the noun being modified by the relative  
> clause (to
> use your terminology).

It's TKD's terminology, not mine.

-- ghunchu'wI'





Back to archive top level