tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Dec 15 21:24:10 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: chagh

Alan Anderson ( [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']

On Dec 15, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Doq wrote:

> I'm putting together a dictionary for my own use. I'm wondering if we
> have any canon to reveal whether the subject of {chagh} is the object
> losing altitude, or the person releasing the descending object.

A little over a year ago, nobody objected to {chagh} being listed as  
unused in canon.  I don't think that has changed in the meantime.


I feel that the existence of the word {pum} "fall" is sufficient  
reason to consider {chagh} "drop" to have the falling object as  But there's no canonical evidence for using it  
one way or the other.

Back to archive top level