tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 04 19:57:16 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
• Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:56:06 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

ghItlh Doq:
 > If we could be more like children and just say stuff in Klingon, we'd
 > probably get better at it than we would if we talk a lot about
 > individual words and individual grammatical constructions.

Just remember that Klingons' brains are likely wired quite differently
than ours, and that what is a natural language to us probably isn't to a
Klingon!

This list supports both talking about the details and just talking in
the language. You don't need to prohibit one to practice the other.

jaw!

SuStel
Stardate 7926.5

• References:
  • Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
    • From: QeS 'utlh <[email protected]>
  • Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
    • From: Doq <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: puqbe'wI'
• Next by Date: Re: Basic grammar question
• Previous by thread: Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
• Next by thread: Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level