tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 28 08:10:40 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)

Philip Newton ([email protected])

• From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)
• Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:10:28 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fgKpjZyyKlsmxVWXHqgXO5ogezyxSn1RWrdiOxAGc5yJCPZjwwRC6q3zRr+Qj00IRFVUBn7GwOJgVO9m+F18e7G9r7hhm6yrB09Bkud9WlvQ+n7KWiYaTFrQdnu49rioczpnGM+qd5U0E/9tMhAr512NEih5OZEUlz36hzBxd8k=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

On 1/28/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seem that you are contrasting your phrase and mine,

I wasn't.

> If you are simply agreeing with me, fine, but that's not my
> impression of what you are saying.

It was supposed to be.

I was speaking more to those who consider {A 'oH B'e'} and {B 'oH
A'e'} to be equivalent.
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 5233.57

• References:
  • Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)
• Next by Date: Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)
• Previous by thread: Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)
• Next by thread: Re: "my name is" (was Re: loy)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level