tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 21 09:53:48 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: yopwaH
- From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: yopwaH
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:53:31 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=R53yKjkMHDpc8z4yMH/D9Q0eQ0yyvq6TPEB1Xy+NTE4YYCEMaHLWpcTBNyS3km5qA6ArvoRwlaj0Fv98l9JHs+7pZIcsGSB5D7Q8/bNqTYUJyfJX4jQbBWz8L+C3cfKd64f4jPy130eJJdZCEk+dVTcz2KcNx4DZ+VT6kxzYNik= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
It'd either be singlular or only plural if you use "-mey" i think. lol If you are referring to the pair itself,. it would still be plural, most likely. You'll have to ask okrand, considering we call it a pair of pants for a reson. It means, pants are consisting of 2 parts, each of which are called a "pant". Then again, it's like computer... De'wI' means informational device which belongs to me... while computer SHOULD be SImwI''a' if you go by english and every other language. Basically, a computer is a big calculator.
Lieven Litaer <[email protected]> wrote: "pants" is plural in english, but is it in Klingon?
My thought is, why should it be so?
So I translate
{xxxDaq 'oHtaH yopwaH}
"The pants are on the xxx"
Quvar.
--
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
---------------------------------
What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos