tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 12 14:17:28 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: easy question

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: easy question
• Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:17:01 EST

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 1/12/2006 3:28:02 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> I don't think Okrand has ever used a number with one of those nouns with a 
> different plural form, but I would opt for {loS mangpu'} if the actual 
> number is important, particularly if it's a relatively low number. 


cha' chovnatlhHeyvam vISamta':

{wa' DoS wIqIp} 
We hit one target | We agree    
[KGT 105,106]

{cha' DoSmey DIqIp} 
We hit two targets | We disagree    
[KGT 106]

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: easy question
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 'IQ jaj, qar'a'?
• Next by Date: Re: easy question
• Previous by thread: Re: 'IQ jaj, qar'a'?
• Next by thread: Re: easy question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level