tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 27 19:36:52 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Negative numbers
- From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Negative numbers
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:36:40 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xKUg88cPFXYFY4uvnYvjqijUGndiJBbwGo56uyMJJ89NKPMe0TXup2MlchdYckFBPJ08ggNK9wZeDA7LTYGSkGnCZHO+v6jp6pyFzPNDSQucu/CpRZ2sfp4DHzo6iP3SoIbqyMZZnqGPulN03migeAaT12SkJKg05+JrdMNYjqk= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
I don't think there will be one. Considering the language is based on culture, Okrand might beleive there is no need for this since you'll pretty much go to hell if you do anything as dishonoring as getting yourself in debt.
Lieven Litaer <[email protected]> wrote: Okay, while we are suggestions non-canon ways for negative numbers... :-)
Nobody has mentioned "below zero" yet:
{pagh bIng wa'}
"(the) below-zero-one" = -1
Yes, as you said these will also need explanation until we get official
rules for that.
Quvar.
--
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com