tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 27 14:19:07 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: HolQeD Republishing...
- From: McArdle <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: HolQeD Republishing...
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:16:57 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=fOnLlUJcJw85zWu8jXXgHasZS1yuocXyNZ4MVOzN1n1ffF64WsDgR6kfkZ6AjKJ3xVzEQcx3zpIJmVEbxnneMrur7AjhfJbQEsSS8tf7dIlc08dFkcZVvezGIllm+iP/MEo7qZ3xn/FIA8gpfX/jIZTxtBMzwvsPBamsGLfNr2s=;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Allow me to cast a dissenting vote. It is apparently impossible to join the KLI these days (I've tried), so that route to access is blocked for anyone who isn't fortunate enough to be a member already. The last thing I'd think you'd want to do is turn away interested parties at the door. From this point of view, the more HolQeD articles on the wiki, the better.
Of course, the best course is to make it possible again to join the KLI. (Step one might be for someone at KLI to start answering their e-mail.) I'd gladly join if this were possible. If anyone knows of a way I can do this, please let me know.
mIq'ey
H Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
On the surface I would vote against it, since HolQeD is one of the
things members of the KLI receive as part of their membership. If HQ
articles were to appear on the web where anyone could get them, why
purchase a membership to the KLI? (present journal droughts aside, of
course)
I imagine that's what Lawrence would say ... but then, I'm not
Lawrence. He'd be the one whose opinion I'd seek on this matter.
-jI'qel ghojwI'
...Paul wrote:
> Quick note before I'm off to lunch (hence no Hol...)
>
> Anyone know if there are issues around putting up on the wiki the content
> of some of the more important articles that were published in the HolQeD?
> For example, in the same vein as the linguistic terms page, I was thinking
> of putting up the mathematical terms/syntax that was discussed in one of
> the really old issues (like volume 5 or something?) since I can never
> remember where I've seen that syntax, and I'm betting quite a few people
> probably don't have access to that issue...
>
> Likewise, I was thinking about trying to aggregate some of the other
> items, like the discussions about quantities (using /Hoch/ before/after,
> how to use the word for 'half', etc...)
>
> ...Paul
>
> ** ...Paul, [email protected], Insane Engineer **
> ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
> "We must become the change we want to see" -- Mahatma Gandhi
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com