tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 11 06:40:35 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
- From: Doq <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:40:13 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=AVj7QxwILCZSLitn+o3z/T9nt5XAKkl9SBQveRDX6UPPeJWm5Z7bZmZozS8bB51M; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
HolQeD 'oH nuq'e'?
-----Original Message-----
>From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Dec 10, 2006 7:59 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Hol chu' HaDlu''a'?
>
>On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Thorwald Peeters wrote:
>>> I think you meant /Holqoq chu'/ (unless you really meant /Hol chu'law'/ --
>>> "new so-called language" vs. "apparently new language")... /-qoq/ is a
>>> Type 3 noun suffix, so it doesn't transition to the adjective following it
>>> (only Type 5 noun suffixes do that).
>>
>> Ah... Now here's the pincher... sign language can be called a "so-called
>> language" and since the article was already a year old, I noticed, the
>> language, whether so-called or not, although new to me, might even not be
>> considered new... 8-)
>
>/Holqoq chu'law'/, then. :)
>
>...Paul
>
> ** ...Paul, [email protected], Insane Engineer **
> ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
> If it's not the same, it should be different.
>
>