tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 30 18:13:34 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC
• Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=js5hRtleRGmcTXSroG/saIxI15wST66K4lxVCrUx/P5Jaa0C5T6OktlhEf2B2w7pdksv9oEgIQovD9Mv66K9etFDycybJy/L/eW+HPaviyfwvlxNQQ8hAuDD0qvx3LgKv4NX+Ytoro4t0xwzbPnlp8U/ZrK077krn7un1SivmO8= ;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- Shane MiQogh <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> SuvwI' HoS tIn je?
> 		

No, [je] is used AFAWK only with nouns. When asked
how to combine multiple adjectives, Okrand gave us the
first
two examples I cited.  The third we have inferred
as possible, since it doesn't violate any grammar we
know of.  IIRC, he expressly rejected the version
with just two adjectives following the noun.  If he
wanted to sanction the option you've given, that would
have been his opportunity to do so.

-- ter'eS

• References:
  • Re: KLBC
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: I wonder who's kissing her now?
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC
• Next by thread: RE: KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level