tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 18 07:32:45 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Hamlet

Steven Boozer ([email protected])



>>   lu'oghta' nIylo roDIS bIl jo'rIj je
>>   Designed by: Nilo Rodis & Bill George. (KBoP)

Voragh:
> > using {'ogh} "invent, devise" is a nice way to finesse the lack of a word
> > for "draw".

lay'tel:
>I would have thought {qon} or {ghItlh} would handle 'draw' at least as well
>as {'ogh}.

I guess "design" covers more than the actual drawing {ghItlh} the art 
work.  It also encompasses compiling {gher} the parts list {'ay'mey tetlh}:

   The verb usually translated {write}, {ghItlh}, refers to the
   physical activity of writing (moving the pencil around, chiseling,
   etc.) The question is, if you can {ghItlh} it, must you also
   {qon} it? That is, is everything that is written down the result
   of composition (in the sense described above)? The answer is "not
   necessarily." There's another verb, {gher}, which doesn't have a
   straightforward equivalent in English, but which has sometimes
   been translated (not entirely satisfactorily) as "formulate" or
   "compile" or "pull together". The idea seems to be that of bringing
   thoughts together into some kind of reasonably coherent form so
   that they can be conveyed to someone else. Thus, one would usually
   say {naD tetlh gher} "he/she compiles the Commendation List" or
   "he/she writes the Commendation List". (Maltz laughed at, but
   accepted, {Soj tetlh gher} for "he/she writes the grocery list".)
   One would probably {gher}, rather than {qon}, a suggested list of
   readings, a gazetteer, a simple menu, or the instructions for
   assembling a toy (assuming the latter is not really an exercise
   in creative writing).                   -- (st.klingon 7/09/1998)




--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons






Back to archive top level