tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 16 12:21:12 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
• Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:20:59 EDT

In a message dated 4/16/2006 1:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

>   It is a 2 dimensional object (the water). When the ship is on the water, 
> it has about 1/3rd under it as well.
> 

No part of the boat is under water.  There is no water above the boat.  Some 
part of the boat is below the level of the surface of the water.  That part 
doesn't count (in English).

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
• Next by Date: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
• Previous by thread: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
• Next by thread: Re: Why we can use words that it'd take klingons 5 minutes to understand.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level