tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 11 04:19:32 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
- From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GypM8F0RJvKri9EeBsMX+Rqtd8EjytUEhw1M+MHLFta/ZVDW0cP8wap4BhDGYPv+EnDGKaJ/QHiBacewI18h6u9ry1Na5QnM/wIql/pWlyiv8R8K2i+49vt34VuH0yrgeP7jsktnX3uyXcBf5VNu2oTXY0hEzURdneI2NPVn3gc= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Oh, i thought when you said plural you ment more than one warrior and/or wife.
QeS 'utlh <[email protected]> wrote: jIghItlhpu', jIja':
>Strictly, {luHoHlu'}, because {be'nal SuvwI' je} is plural.
mujang Shane MiQogh, ja':
>how so?
Because you're talking about two people: {be'nal} "the wife" and {SuvwI'}
"the warrior". The conjunction {je} makes the two nouns behave as one large
noun phrase.
QeS 'utlh
tlhIngan Hol yejHaD pabpo' / Grammarian of the Klingon Language Institute
not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' ngo' je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
- Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh
_________________________________________________________________
Bounce Back from sickness and injury today.
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fclk%2Eatdmt%2Ecom%2FMOS%2Fgo%2Fnnmsngem0010000007mos%2Fdirect%2F01%2F&_t=753470755&_r=HM_Tagline_Apr06&_m=EXT
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.