tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 08 17:10:27 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: *be'nI'nal

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: *be'nI'nal
• Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 20:08:28 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' naHQun:
> How would ya'll interpret the word {be'nI'nal}?

Badly.

I'm guessing that you want it to mean sister-in-law, but I'm  
absolutely certain I would never use it myself unless I were making a  
joke.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • *be'nI'nal
    • From: "naHQun" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: *be'nI'nal
• Next by Date: RE: buy' ngop!
• Previous by thread: Re: [KLBC] RE: *be'nI'nal
• Next by thread: Re: *be'nI'nal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level