tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jun 05 22:53:50 2005
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: More on Ray Charles
- From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: More on Ray Charles
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:49:05 +1000
jIQagh:
>*{'e' Hoch ram vInajtaH} is ungrammatical; {'e' Hoch ram vInaj} is the
>correct way of saying this.
jang lay'tel SIvten:
>Perhaps without the {-taH} it is more sensible, but does the clash between
>adverbial and verb suffix make the sentence ungrammatical? My objection is
>to the adverbial {Hoch ram} after the object {'e'}. I would say {Hoch ram
>'e' vInaj}.
Yes, I should have said that too. :S The time stamp comes at the start of a
sentence.
Savan,
QeS lagh
taghwI' pabpo' / Beginners' Grammarian
not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' ngo' je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
- Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh
_________________________________________________________________
REALESTATE: biggest buy/rent/share listings
http://ninemsn.realestate.com.au