tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 24 07:26:01 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype

Lieven L. Litaer ([email protected])

• From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype
• Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:26:28 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Organization: qepHom.de
• References: <[email protected]>
• User-agent: Opera7.11/Win32 M2 build 2887

Am Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:16:16 EDT hat <[email protected]> 
geschrieben:

> jatlhlaHqu'bej puqbe'wI', 'ach jatlhlaHbe'chugh, {-wI'} vIlo' vIneH.

jIyajbe'.
Are you saying that if she would not be able to speak, you'd use {-wI'} 
anyway?
That's a good point. {-wIj} is used for things only. Computers and vIlInHoD 
do speak to, but they are not "able to speak".

> jIqeqba' je.

batlh bIqeq.
Do'Ha' naDev qeqqu'lu'be'law'.

Quvar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype yISuq!
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: DI (n)
• Next by Date: Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype yISuq!
• Previous by thread: Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype yISuq!
• Next by thread: Re: De'wI'wIj vIngu'; pagh vIngu''a'? (Re: Skype
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level