tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 06 06:39:58 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
- From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
- Date: 06 Oct 2004 15:39:43 +0200
=3Echristoph.pichlmann:
=3E=3E=3E nuqDaq tu'lu'laH?
=3E
=3Eyou have two type5 suffixes here.
=3Eliterally translated, this sounds like
=3E =22where can it is found?=22
ghuy'cha' jay'=21
jIleghlaHbe'bej...
=22laH=22 vInejta', 'ach =22taH=22 vISampu' - 'ej vItu'be'...
Intended Meaning:
Damned.
I am blind, apparently. (The =22apparently=22 is meant to be ironic.)
I looked up =22laH=22, but found =22taH=22 and didn t notice it.
--------------
I found the word in the KLL part of KCD, but where's the sentence from?