tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 01 15:04:06 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
imperative with VS9 (-bogh)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: imperative with VS9 (-bogh)
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:03:13 EDT
In a message dated 2004-10-01 5:22:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
> >And the Klingon equivalent may be >yIleghbogh<.
>
> But would it be understood as having the same meaning as "quod vide"?
> Remember, too, that relative clauses (except for a couple of bizarre
> examples) require head nouns. I just can't wrap my head around ??{Doch
> yIleghbogh} "the thing which see".
>
> QeS lagh
>
le'qu' lo'vam 'e' vIchID. DuH lo' 'e' vI'ang neH vIneH. 'ach chovnatlh
qanob:
"QeDmey Sar vIHaD vIneH, 'ach QIn yIleghbogh ngeHpu' vavwI' 'ej QInDaq *wa'
QeD neH vIHaD 'e' chaw'* ghItlh."
jumqu'taH'a' chovnatlhvam?
lay'tel SIvten