In a message dated 2004-11-24 5:24:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > I think this sort of thing is what lay'SIv was trying to get at. > (jImujchugh, HIlughmoH, lay'SIv.) > Kind of, but not really. I was alluding to an old issue and didn't want to get into the controversy itself again. lay'tel SIvten