tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 23 16:52:46 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: paghHu'/paghleS

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
• Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 19:52:03 EDT

In a message dated 2004-05-23 3:10:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> You've been around long enough to see the discussions on "how far can we
> stretch the language ourselves".  I can't imagine that you're so surprised
> at the reaction you got around this.
> 
> ...Paul
> 

It's not such a stretch to me.  Obviously it is to others.  That's why I was 
so surprised by the reaction.  
(repeat request:  Can anyone direct me to Krankor's article on this topic?)
lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: to bed vs. to the bed
• Next by Date: RE: paghHu'/paghleS
• Previous by thread: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
• Next by thread: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level