tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 03 15:28:32 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
KLBC {X-Hom X X-'a'} and Re: Verbs of quality and 'e'
- From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
- Subject: KLBC {X-Hom X X-'a'} and Re: Verbs of quality and 'e'
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 08:25:16 +1000
- Bcc:
ghItlhpu' SuStel:
>Grammatically, there's no reason why you can't do this. But let's look at
>what you're actually saying. /DuH/ "It is possible." WHAT is possible?
>You didn't use an indefinite subject (-lu') here, so this sentence must
>have
>SOME subject; what is it?
If I may make a suggestion:
(chaq) Human Hol qub ghoj chaH. DuH ghu'vetlh.
"(Perhaps) they learn rare human languages. That situation is possible."
I don't think that this would be *wrong* without {chaq}, but it might be a
little less accurate, and one should always strive for accuracy. However, I
don't think {ghu'} is out of place as a subject for the verb {DuH}.
While it involves a verb with {-ghach} (a construct I still shy away from,
not understanding it all that well yet), a recast of the idea might be
DuH ('oH) Human Hol qub ghojtaHghachchaj'e'
"Their learning of rare human languages is possible/a possibility"
ghItlhtaH:
>If you can't answer this question with a grammatically appropriate subject,
>I wouldn't phrase it this way. And if you can come up with a good subject,
>then I'd leave the subject in. Subject or objects may be elided if they're
>being repeated, but there's no repetition here.
Of course, repetition is a big thing in Klingon, and not as resounding as it
is in English. I wouldn't see a problem even if a repeated subject were left
in a sentence. Look at {beyHom bey bey'a' jachtaH} (from TKW, IIRC, even
though this isn't a great example).
Which leads to the KLBC part of the message: {beyHom bey bey'a' jachtaH}
looks a little bizarre; it's not a construct I've seen anywhere else. Would
the following sentence work?
{nom chechmeH HIvje'Hom HIvje' HIvje''a' lo'}
In order to get drunk quickly, he uses ever-larger cups
If this is possible, is the {X-Hom X X-'a'} part singular, or plural? (Hence
{HIvje'Hom HIvje' HIvje''a' lulo'} for "they use ever-larger cups".)
Savan.
QeS lagh
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp?banner=emailtag&referrer=hotmail