tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 12 11:50:10 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: inherent plurals, etc.

Philip Newton ([email protected])

• From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: inherent plurals, etc.
• Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:49:58 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Organization: very little
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:28:08 -0600, "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D."
<[email protected]> wrote:

> {lolSeHcha} - attitide-control thrusters
> {'eDSeHcha} - take-off / landing thrusters

I imagine we can say with confidence that these are plural nouns (that
take a singular verb) based on the fact that they appear to contain
'cha', which is such an inherently plural noun.

Philip
HovpoH 2269.33

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: inherent plurals, etc.
    • From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>

• References:
  • inherent plurals, etc.
    • From: [email protected]
  • RE: inherent plurals, etc.
    • From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: inherent plurals, etc.
• Next by Date: RE: inherent plurals, etc.
• Previous by thread: RE: inherent plurals, etc.
• Next by thread: RE: inherent plurals, etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level