tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 12 08:25:29 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: lol (was Re: taH...)

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: lol (was Re: taH...)
• Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:22:39 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' QeS lagh:
>(BTW: I don't see a problem with adding a subject, too: {maghwI'pu' vIHoHmeH
>taj} "a knife for me to kill traitors with". I'm not sure of the stance of
>the rest of the list on this, but I don't know any reason why not.)

It's explicitly correct.

-----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Okrand <[email protected]>
> Newsgroups: startrek.expertforum
> Date: Sunday, January 18, 1998 05:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Problem with {-meH} and negative meanings
> [...]
>     {jIpaSqu'mo' narghpu' qaSuchmeH 'eb.} "Because I'm very late, the
> opportunity to visit you has escaped."  ({-mo'} "because," {narghpu'} "has
> escaped," {qaSuchmeH 'eb} "opportunity for me to visit you")

• References:
  • lol (was Re: taH...)
    • From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Next by Date: RE: inherent plurals, etc.
• Previous by thread: lol (was Re: taH...)
• Next by thread: qep'a'Daq puvmeH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level