tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 03 23:28:05 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey

Lieven L. Litaer ([email protected])

• From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:27:21 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Organization: qepHom.de
• References: <[email protected]>
• User-agent: Opera7.11/Win32 M2 build 2887

Due to lack of time, I didn't read the whole discussion.

I think the idea is not so bad though.
We can avoid any copyright problems if we don't use english translations.
And we can avoid the problem of the ambiguous words just by not using them. 
The use of a word can be made clear by listing up some canon examples, for 
instance:

Sung (n) [no canon]

  but

jaH (v) naDevvo' vaS'a'Daq majaHlaH'a'? [pk] may'Daq jaHDI' SuvwI' 
juppu'Daj lonbe'. [tkw]

Even if it doesn't explain everything like this, at least one can see how 
it is done correctly.

Quvar.

• References:
  • Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: [iso-8859-15] Re: Klingon Music: Kosmic Horrör
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: Daw' (v)
• Previous by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Next by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level