tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 03 10:56:03 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: "creative"

d'Armond Speers, Ph.D. ([email protected])

• From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: "creative"
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:55:30 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

> Anyone can be creative. Not just craftsmen, but not everyone is.
> Yes {chenmoHlaH} means "be creative", but what I mean is not just being
> able, but also doing it spontaneous and actually *doing* it 8-)

{chenmoHlaH} does not mean "be creative."  It means "he can create (it)"
(and other null-prefix options).  You can't, for instance, say *{ghot
chenmoHlaH} to mean "creative person"; this means "he can create a person."

Just wanted to clear that up.

> Thorwald Peeters

--Holtej

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: "creative"
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: "creative"
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: "creative"
• Next by Date: RE: "creative"
• Previous by thread: Re: "creative"
• Next by thread: RE: "creative"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level