tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 20 23:03:14 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect

Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) ([email protected])

• From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:28:46 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Am 20.01.2004 16:10:34, schrieb Steven Boozer <[email protected]>:

>Quvar:
>>like an empty, deserted station where everyone has left?
>
>No.  That's {chIm} "be empty, be deserted, be uninhabited".

Euhrrg, yes. I should more precise in these definitions:
I asked if this is the same "desert" as in "be deserted"

When you "desert" {choS} a place, it becomes "deserted" {chIm}
When you "desert" from your military company, you "defect" {cheH}.

Quvar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: DCKL translation problems: {'Im}
• Prev by thread: Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
• Next by thread: Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level