tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 10 03:32:46 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBG

Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) ([email protected])

• From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBG
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:13:05 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Am 09.01.2004 23:17:22, schrieb "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>:

>I don't know. We have {Dat} "everywhere", but I'm not sure there is an easy
>way to say this.
>You might be able to get away with something like {paghDaq} "in/at/to
>nothing", but it seems like a stretch.

 - nuqDaq?
 - paghDaq!

Although it looks weird, it follows the pattern...

Maltz was not so sure about using {-Ha'} on adverbials, but since there are a few maybe {*DatHa'} 
could work for "nowhere".

Quvar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBG
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: KLBG
    • From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon Rap
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: chevwI' tlhoy' (n)
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBG
• Next by thread: Re: KLBG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level