tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 08 10:43:10 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)

sangqar ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
• Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 08:32:44 -0700
• In-reply-to: <4025F32E.28862.51B70F4@localhost>
• Priority: normal
• References: <[email protected]>

> <Hol wa'DIch SuqtaHbogh> 

HIvqa' veqlargh! SuqtaH*ghach*.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
• Next by Date: Re: other person imperatives
• Prev by thread: Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
• Next by thread: Re: Sung Hol (was: Re: to everyone In defense of tlhIngan Hol)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level