tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 23 06:53:42 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Probability

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Probability
• Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:52:58 -0400
• References: <[email protected]>

From: <[email protected]>
> wIghelbe'chugh, chay' Holvam wIghojlaHta'?
> jang neHbe'chugh SuStel, vaj jangnISbe',
> 'ach DochnISbe' je! pIj tetlhvamDaq ta'pu' 'e' vItu'pu'. qatlh?


Oh, gimme a break!  I'm all for learning, probing, and questioning, but the
intent of this thread has been to try to find a single formulaic way to
express probabilities.  That's not a particularly useful or helpful thing to
do.  Learn to express your concepts, not translate the way English does
something.  Different concepts may require different constructions.

I'm sorry I don't have THE way to express probability in Klingon.  What's
wrong with a bunch of different ways, depending on the situation?  Why is
this such a horrible alternative?

SuStel
Stardate 4310.9

• References:
  • Re: Probability
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Probability
• Next by Date: Re: Probability
• Previous by thread: Re: Probability
• Next by thread: Re: Probability
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level